Just in! UTEP'S 2006-2007 Budget!

Tonight's episode stars, oh wow!

UTEP Athletic Director Mr. Robert W. Stull, M.A. as himself in:

"Did Bob's light bulb merely flicker dimly this time, or did it simply blow a fuse and go out?"

Athletic Director and Miner Foundation Account Numbers:

29-2662-1009 and 19-0420-0009. Mr. Robert Stull. Both reflect a 0% increase over last year. Thus, Mr. Stull is still stuck with a combined yearly salary of only $193.00.

"So, what about Mr. Stull's two leading ladies, was he able to sacrifice his own raise to help either one or both of them out?"

You can just bet he did! And here's the proof (heh, heh!):

Sports Medicine Account Number:

29-2662-6009. Ms. Dawn E. Hearn, M.S., Trainer. A 5% net increase over last year, which gives her $57,750 per year.

Student Athletic Services Account Number:

29-2662-2009. Ms. Lisa D. Campos, M.S., Associate Director. A 5% net increase over last year, which gives her $63,000 per year.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Excerpt: Day of the Ly'n Hos, the University of Texas at El Paso Story.
Copyright: 2005
First Refusal Rights: Simon and Schuster, New York, New York.

"UTEP's Mr. Stull was by this time well aware that it was only a matter of time before he had the feds all over his as* thanks to any number of reasons, including the famous accusations of a Duke University-style pack attack, both verbal and physical against two(2) NMSU coeds in the presence of UTEP Coach Mike Price by trash talking bench warmers on the UTEP Miners team at the 2005 NMSU-UTEP game in Las Cruces.

"Thus, the hypothetical for instance of a civil law suit in federal district court by Ms. Hearn regarding unlawful discrimination by he, Mr.Robert W. Stull, in awarding raises to senior female employees was thus something Mr. Stull desperately needed to avoid. Under these circumstances, awarding each female employee a 5% yearly raise, even though only Ms. Hearn deserved it, while super gofer Ms. Campos didn't, was good sense. At least that's what Mr. Stull naively thought, apparently believing it would look particularly generous in view of his giving himself a 0% increase for that same budget year of 2006-2007.

"But the basic question still remained: would the Feds buy it?"